DescentBB

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ ... li=BBnb7Kz

why does he float these near-treasonous notions of distrust with provable lies? Just what the nation needs, another unfounded conspiracy idea to make folks lose trust in the institution of elections, which can be demonstrated as extremely fair overall. As I say, sowing such seeds of doubt with no proof is close to treason, given how it helps those who would destroy the US from within.

Fer crying out loud! What a load of BS. Trump must think that saying something that outrageous it must make it true. Here's some more Kool-Aid for you stupid Trumptards.

tunnelcat wrote:Fer crying out loud! What a load of BS. Trump must think that saying something that outrageous it must make it true. Here's some more Kool-Aid for you stupid Trumptards.

And yet you stupid liberals bought Sen Reids statement that Romney didn't pay taxes for ten years...hook, line and sinker.

huh? Grasping at the stupid straw again, Woody? Your boy is toast, now.

And your straws are not stupid?

The Dems hit rock bottom when Bill was in office and continued thereafter with their ongoing adulation of Bill.

Holy ★■◆● you are delusional woody. Get some goddamn help before you hurt someone.

Woody's got a point. Why are the Democrats even keeping the Clintons around? Bill had his chance at a great presidency and royally screwed the pooch, for his legacy, for Al Gore and for every Dem for years by giving the farm away to the Republicans while he played with non-marital sex in the Oval Office, on our dime. I mean, Bill pretty much gave us 2 horrible terms of Bush. I'm ashamed to say I voted for Bush because of the support Gore gave him in the Rose Garden after the impeachment. Gore wasn't his own man in my opinion. The Clintons need to retire and just GO AWAY. We need NEW liberal blood. There isn't a liberal bone left in either of the Clintons and they stink to high heaven.

You're just as BAD as Woody,if you are willing to tar Ms Clinton with the Bill brush. As for his Presidency, he certainly did not preside over a failed Presidency, just flawed by personal conduct. Only in a world so polarized would either be seen as anything but a left-leaning centrist, and that's ok, because the Dems have NEVER been a purely liberal group. As I've said, she's less than perfect, but if the question is around who is prepared and tempermentally and ethically fit for office, she is the only real choice.

Ethically fit? Ahahahahahaha

yes, ethically.

callmeslick wrote: You're just as BAD as Woody,if you are willing to tar Ms Clinton with the Bill brush. As for his Presidency, he certainly did not preside over a failed Presidency, just flawed by personal conduct. Only in a world so polarized would either be seen as anything but a left-leaning centrist, and that's ok, because the Dems have NEVER been a purely liberal group. As I've said, she's less than perfect, but if the question is around who is prepared and tempermentally and ethically fit for office, she is the only real choice.

If she'd dumped Bill and became her own woman in her own right, then I'd have a different opinion. But since she's stuck with him all these years and will certainly be dragging pervo Bill along with her into the White House and giving him a job, he's right back home where he's comfortable. You tell me, if you're going to harp about Republicans being hypocrites by voting for a sexual predator, why essentially put a previous sexual predator, Bill Clinton, right back in there by voting for Hillary? Sure, she's not one who's a disgusting pervert, but he's tagging along like a drooling puppy who can't wait to chew on the furniture, so we'll most likely have him right back in the Oval Office. It's no better. The Democrats could have made a change and done far better for themselves. Now people are having to decide which is the least objectionable candidate to vote for, NOT who's the best person for the job.

Maybe, just maybe, Hillary talked things out with Bill and found it in her heart to forgive him his trespasses? Or are you insinuating that every person who's been cheated on by their spouse should automatically divorce them without a second thought?

Top Gun wrote:Maybe, just maybe, Hillary talked things out with Bill and found it in her heart to forgive him his trespasses? Or are you insinuating that every person who's been cheated on by their spouse should automatically divorce them without a second thought?

I can understand a woman forgiving her husband for a one time affair. In Hillary Clintons case one doesn't have enough fingers and toes to count up the number of time ole Bill cuckolded Hillary. And to make matters worse, by all accounts Hillary helped intimidate Bills victims. And slick wonders why I laughed when he said Hillary is ethical.

no one asked if you understand ANYTHING other than her life is none of your fecking business.

It is if she is running for POTUS. So in the same vein, Trumps personal business is none of your concern.

nope his recorded words,and how they inform of his sense of entitlement and views of allowable sexual assault matter to EVERYONE voting on Nov 8.