won't happen unless there is some clear, presented Constitutional issue. I don't see that happening. As noted by the Federal Court decision in Colorado, if a state has laws binding electors to the outcome, they cannot, by law, change. Wishful thinking. Folks had the chance on November 9, and we deal with it from there.
Re: Change of heart?
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 2:12 pm
by Tunnelcat
You don't think the intervention in our national election by a foreign government, Russia, constitutes a Constitutional issue? Just sayin'.
Re: Change of heart?
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 3:10 pm
by callmeslick
tunnelcat wrote:You don't think the intervention in our national election by a foreign government, Russia, constitutes a Constitutional issue? Just sayin'.
oh, I do, but I put the qualifier word 'presented' in there. In other words, mere rumors won't cut it, but if the whole of the electors were presented a compelling set of evidence that makes it seem likely that such intervention occurred, they would be in the situation described in the Federalist Papers as a rationale for having the Electoral College in the first place.
Re: Change of heart?
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 5:05 pm
by sigma
You should not care about Russia. Russia will be able to take care of herself.
Re: Change of heart?
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:54 pm
by callmeslick
as if other things haven't been cause for intelligent humans to have at least some pause. The fact that this video shows our new Secretary of Energy(in charge of nuclear power, and regulation of nuclear materials, among many other complex issues) at work should push anyone over the cliff:
this guy will replace a PhD in physics. Honest to gawd. Nukes. Really??
Re: Change of heart?
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:56 pm
by callmeslick
oh, and in case some feeble apologist wishes to come along and say,"Slick is picking a celebrity appearance on TV", may I remind you, this dolt has proven himself to be a drooling idiot at virtually every step of TWO Presidential campaigns. So, yes, I picked a humorous clip, with a bit less irony than when he was onstage forgetting which departments of the federal government he wanted to eliminate.
Re: Change of heart?
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 8:02 pm
by Nightshade
I guess conservatives should launch an elector-flipping campaign the next time a dangerous left wing presidential candidate wins as well.
Re: Change of heart?
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 6:24 am
by callmeslick
if that candidate is truly dangerous, or involved with a foreign power, that is their obligation.