DescentBB

500 bucks for access to the president, “what a bargain”.

Seriously for 5 bills you probably get the equivalent access of a White House tour.

At Hillary Clinton's last George Clooney fundraising dinner, the guests had to pony up $353 K for the privilege of having a place at the table with her and the Clooney's. The Donald is cheap. I could afford it.

tunnelcat wrote:At Hillary Clinton's last George Clooney fundraising dinner, the guests had to pony up $353 K for the privilege of having a place at the table with her and the Clooney's. The Donald is cheap. I could afford it.

that is true, he sells out cheap. They contacted me about dropping a grand for lunch with sonny boy Trump(Eric). That's cheap ass access. If I'd thought I could make it through the meal without vomitting, I might have considered it.

callmeslick wrote:http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/m ... rty-233070

Why is this allowed if there is commentary...at least that is what TB is told before his thread is locked.

woodchip wrote:

callmeslick wrote:http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/m ... rty-233070

Why is this allowed if there is commentary...at least that is what TB is told before his thread is locked.

Whatever on Earth are you talking about? No one in the thread crossed any lines that I see, and the original topic is legitimate by all standards. Making up a new set of rules for us?

woodchip wrote:Why is this allowed if there is commentary...at least that is what TB is told before his thread is locked.

No lines crossed that I could see. Which of TB's posts are you referring to?

Starting a thread with no commentary I thought was against the rules. Things change when you became a mod TC?

Well, I've never gotten a set of rules from Krom. If posting a thread with no commentary is against the rules as you say, hopefully they'll let me know.

woodchip wrote:Starting a thread with no commentary I thought was against the rules. Things change when you became a mod TC?

excuse me, the commentary was in the title.

Want some crooked Hillary?

[Removed]

callmeslick wrote:

woodchip wrote:Starting a thread with no commentary I thought was against the rules. Things change when you became a mod TC?

excuse me, the commentary was in the title.

Well no, all you did was post the link without any comment on your part slick. I am looking into this very question however.

tunnelcat wrote:

callmeslick wrote:

woodchip wrote:Starting a thread with no commentary I thought was against the rules. Things change when you became a mod TC?

excuse me, the commentary was in the title.

Well no, all you did was post the link without any comment on your part slick. I am looking into this very question however.

Tsk. Don't like the videos, TC?

It was a little redundant don't you think NS? We already know Hillary is a crooked you-know-what. Blah, blah, blah. Post stuff we don't know about instead of the same old tired right wing rants. Besides, she lost the election and your guy won, so don't be a sore winner. Aren't we past all that now anyway? Trump is now in the hot seat. Maybe you're upset that Trump isn't going to prosecute Hillary, or at least try to.

tunnelcat wrote:It was a little redundant don't you think NS? We already know Hillary is a crooked you-know-what. Blah, blah, blah. Post stuff we don't know about instead of the same old tired right wing rants. Besides, she lost the election and your guy won, so don't be a sore winner. Aren't we past all that now anyway? Trump is now in the hot seat. Maybe you're upset that Trump isn't going to prosecute Hillary, or at least try to.

It's something about rule of law, TC. Nobody should be above the law.

YES, Hillary lost...but she committed some unforgivable crimes and should be prosecuted just like any other Joe Blow that has broken the law.

The minute there is one law for the masses and another for the elite- we are a just another banana republic.

I'm pretty sure Hillary ≠ Princess Leia.



Hillary had her own evil empire.

Oh looky, the battle of the cartoons.

Nightshade wrote:

tunnelcat wrote:It was a little redundant don't you think NS? We already know Hillary is a crooked you-know-what. Blah, blah, blah. Post stuff we don't know about instead of the same old tired right wing rants. Besides, she lost the election and your guy won, so don't be a sore winner. Aren't we past all that now anyway? Trump is now in the hot seat. Maybe you're upset that Trump isn't going to prosecute Hillary, or at least try to.

It's something about rule of law, TC. Nobody should be above the law.

YES, Hillary lost...but she committed some unforgivable crimes and should be prosecuted just like any other Joe Blow that has broken the law.

The minute there is one law for the masses and another for the elite- we are a just another banana republic.

Look NS, I don't like her any more than you do and I'm quite certain she did things the way she did to protect her own personal secrets. It was an insanely stupid thing for her to do and it smacked of arrogance. She works for the people and the government, not herself. But there comes a point where you're just rehashing old partisan arguments and rants. Besides, this whole email mess has already been litigated, via several congressional investigations over the years and by the FBI for months and was probably the main reason she lost the election. The FBI went through everything she did during her tenure as Sec State and decided that her actions, no matter how sloppy or secretive, did NOT reach the level of criminality for prosecution, period. End of story. You should be jumping for joy that she's not our pres. Anything said or done beyond that smacks of a partisan vendetta and that's not how the justice system works in this country. Now, if her personal server HAD been hacked, then we'd have a totally different story to talk about, but the FBI never found any evidence of that. If you happen to find that smoking gun no one else has, you can post it here and perhaps even send it on to the FBI, as long as it's not fake news, and satisfy your thirst for revenge.

If you want to read Dan Abrams take on it, watch here. Not that it's a satisfying outcome.



And slick and NS, either post some serious commentary or this thread is done.