DescentBB

Heh...all too weird.

saw that the other day, and was shocked to find it was legit.

callmeslick wrote:saw that the other day, and was shocked to find it was legit.

I'm just sad that Trump had to win for Hillary to lose.

Which was the bigger danger? The conman or the crook?

I was pretty clear on that one. First, she was nowhere near a crook, and there is not one shred of evidence that she ever committed a single crime.
Second, the ability to manipulate and compromise Trump outweighs ANY shortcomings Clinton brought to the table. I said that for a year, plus(for the record, so did you), and here we START(like, this stuff is far from done) to see we were correct.

Nightshade wrote: Which was the bigger danger? The conman or the crook?

callmeslick wrote:

Nightshade wrote: Which was the bigger danger? The conman or the crook?

We might actually find out more about them when the new AG takes over.

apparently, we're going to find out why the FBI chose to float memos about them. Beyond that, wouldn't you agree that there are FAR more serious issues to look into? Or, do you not care that you might be handing the keys to someone working for a foreign power?

callmeslick wrote: Or, do you not care that you might be handing the keys to someone working for a foreign power?

And the Dem attempt at fear and de-legitimizing continues.

the truth and proof will come out. Maybe as a slow drip, maybe a bright golden shower. We'll see, but it's smelling more legitimate by the day.

callmeslick wrote:Or, do you not care that you might be handing the keys to someone working for a foreign power?

He might be working for a foreign power, but the much more likely and just as damaging prospect is that he is working foremost for himself.

for himself in a desperate attempt to save his fat ass, yes. That is my general thinking......