Page 1 of 1
well, he's technically broken Federal Law already
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:21 pm
by callmeslick
you can't hawk your wife's jewelry on QVC on an official government website:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pow ... ccd072ca8d
Re: well, he's technically broken Federal Law already
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:26 pm
by Top Gun
So it took him, what, less than six hours to ignore that inconvenient piece of paper? Bravo!
Re: well, he's technically broken Federal Law already
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:03 pm
by woodchip
Still OCD Trump bashing.
Re: well, he's technically broken Federal Law already
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 8:15 pm
by callmeslick
oh, that pesky Constitution and all. So trivial.
Re: well, he's technically broken Federal Law already
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 8:18 pm
by Top Gun
woodchip wrote:Still OCD Trump bashing.
You could win a limbo championship with all the doubling-over you've been doing recently. Still proud of electing an absolute corporate slut?
Re: well, he's technically broken Federal Law already
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:15 pm
by Nightshade
callmeslick wrote:oh, that pesky Constitution and all. So trivial.
Obama never bothered to follow the Constitution when he found it inconvenient. He made it far more trivial than any other president before him. (Yes, even more than that devil you knew as Bush.)
Re: well, he's technically broken Federal Law already
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:11 am
by Krom
If you believe the republicans in government would have let Obama of all people get away with not following the constitution... Think about it for a second, if you are even capable of doing so; the republicans in congress have spent the majority of the last 8 years trying everything they could possibly come up with or flat out fabricate to bring down Obama, there is no way they would let something as inflammatory as a violation of the constitution pass without calling for impeachment on the spot. Can you find a reputable source of records showing where Obama didn't follow the constitution and had congress or the supreme court actually take action and call him on it? Because someone who is subject to as much scrutiny as the president would not be able to avoid getting caught. If you say "well he did this with immigration or that with executive orders", then the question is why didn't the conservative majority in congress or the supreme court take action on it? How could Obama keep them from impeaching him on it? You constantly say how weak he and other democrats are, but if they are so weak how could they possibly have so much power and influence that they could suppress dissidence from a republican majority in both congress and the supreme court through most of both terms? It doesn't add up.