DescentBB

1. Make first time homebuyers pay more because Trump cancelled an exec order that lowers insurance rates on homes for first time buyers.

2. Demand immediate end to all Twitter accounts linked to the dept of the Interior. Why? Because that was the source of the photo that clearly
showed that virtually NO ONE showed up to watch the inauguration who wasn't invited or protesting.


oh, and 'Making America Great'? The inaugural hats were made in China. Nice.

So I figured I would do some research on this statement…(just for kicks)

“Trump cancelled an exec order that lowers insurance rates on homes for first time buyers.”

This is from the very first website I looked at. (the one at the top of the list)

“Castro said the cut, of a quarter of a percentage point, was necessary to offset rising mortgage rates. If it had gone in effect, it would have saved a homebuyer borrowing $200,000 about $500 on their yearly insurance premium.”

This statement is in error…at best, terrible misleading…at worse, a blatant lie.

Can any of you “critical thinkers” figure it out?

not sure what the math adds up to, not being a first time buyer, but a friend in Oregon confirmed the cost of around $500 of the move, as his daughter is in the process of a first-timer FHA loan.

Oh, and by way of follow-up myself, the initial demand from Interior was taken back quickly, after they located and removed all retweets of crowd size pics. Still shows a certain mentality, especially since his Highness now, in Presidential appearance,claims everyone is lying about his tiny crowd.

He can't hide from the internet......yet.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/cc6855a9-c ... empty.html

callmeslick wrote:not sure what the math adds up to, not being a first time buyer, but a friend in Oregon confirmed the cost of around $500 of the move, as his daughter is in the process of a first-timer FHA loan.

Well, have your friend break it down for us, otherwise admit you can’t figure it out.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-t ... story.html

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/arti ... ge-fee-cut

Ok, I see where I made my mistake...

Duh..

tunnelcat wrote:He can't hide from the internet......yet.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/cc6855a9-c ... empty.html

Two reasons I think that happened:

1) Most of DC is democrat territory. They're not particularly enthused about Trump.

2) Republicans from the rest of the country "held their nose" to vote for Trump only because it was Hillary on the opposite ticket. They weren't enthused enough to make a trip to DC either.

I was a "never Trumper," but seeing how rule of law was being destroyed under democrats- I had to vote Trump.

Certainly not happy about it and I'm wary of his presidency, but I'm willing to wait and see what happens.

Nightshade wrote:but seeing how rule of law was being destroyed under democrats

bull★■◆●.

so, NS, to summarize: you were a 'Never Trumper' until you weren't.........nice. [Deleted - Personal Shot]

callmeslick wrote:[Deleted - Personal Shot]

Oh sure. It's "feeble" and "made up" because you didn't care that Hillary and Obama were corrupt liars/criminals that put their own ambitions above the safety and security of the country and its people.

Nightshade wrote:

callmeslick wrote:feeble, made up nonsense around the Dems doesn't make you appear a bit smarter, either.

Oh sure. It's "feeble" and "made up" because you didn't care that Hillary and Obama were corrupt liars/criminals that put their own ambitions above the safety and security of the country and its people.

right, because she never did, once. And yet you lie about it, repeatedly. Also about the violation of the Constitution. Why lie, if you have such a weak case?

Apparently he's following the Trump doctrine of repeating a lie a bunch of times until enough people assume it's true.

Nightshade wrote:

tunnelcat wrote:He can't hide from the internet......yet.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/cc6855a9-c ... empty.html

Two reasons I think that happened:

1) Most of DC is democrat territory. They're not particularly enthused about Trump.

2) Republicans from the rest of the country "held their nose" to vote for Trump only because it was Hillary on the opposite ticket. They weren't enthused enough to make a trip to DC either.

I was a "never Trumper," but seeing how rule of law was being destroyed under democrats- I had to vote Trump.

Certainly not happy about it and I'm wary of his presidency, but I'm willing to wait and see what happens.

That isn't really the problem. So what that he didn't have the crowds Obama had, that's immaterial in the grand scheme of things now. He's got a country to run. What Trump's real problem is has to do with his reaction to stuff like this. He can't let it slide, even something as insignificant and unimportant as this. He reacts like a rabid dog. He's not stable. He can't focus on what's important. He only worries about his ego and prestige. And this is the man people elected as the leader of our country. THAT'S what I worry about. For example, Trump's response about the crowd differences to the press through his obnoxious press secretary:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... 1f7fdaa3a1

hence my new sig. These guys actually think they can convince you to not accept visual or audible reality.


Want another scare?? Look into WHY the nominee for CIA director had his final committee voting meeting pushed back to Monday? Apparently, he told the committe members that he wants to establish a new CIA data base,of American citizens, sorted by ethnicity, by voting patterns, by networking, etc, according to an interview I saw with a committee member. That is chilling. This is the CIA, with files on domestic residents? What the actual ★■◆●?

What a fool…the DHS probably already has such a list…

callmeslick wrote:hence my new sig. These guys actually think they can convince you to not accept visual or audible reality.

LOL! "The Party told you to reject all evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
George Orwell---"1984"

And that didn't apply to the democrat party these past 8 years...HOW? They rejected all evidence contrary to their party line. Orwellian "Party" down to the last day. They even had a "Ministry of Truth."

Hey TB I hear that typing random insane bull★■◆● doesn't magically make it true. Care to comment?

It is a well known fact that one of the first moves in the republican playbook is that anything, no matter how outlandish, becomes the truth if you repeat it enough times. Like for example, how many investigations into Benghazi were there? 7? 8? 10? And all of them didn't find anything worth pressing charges over. Somewhere around the time the republicans immediately demanded an investigation into all the previous investigations because they disagreed with the results should have tipped everyone off that the investigations were just a smokescreen.

The real goal of the investigations was to fuel the republicans narrative of "guilty until proven guilty" because there is no such thing as an innocent democrat. Just look at TB's recent posts on the subjects, he always presumes guilt when it comes to democrats. Comical behavior from someone who talks about "justice" and "the rule of law".

Krom wrote:IComical behavior from someone who talks about "justice" and "the rule of law".

Justice is always there.
I agree that it's a bit wicked, but it is justice that can't regulate any laws, apart from the usual human

Krom wrote:IComical behavior from someone who talks about "justice" and "the rule of law".

Justice is always there.
I agree that it's a bit wicked, but it is justice that can't regulate any laws, apart from the usual human

callmeslick wrote:hence my new sig. These guys actually think they can convince you to not accept visual or audible reality.


Want another scare?? Look into WHY the nominee for CIA director had his final committee voting meeting pushed back to Monday? Apparently, he told the committe members that he wants to establish a new CIA data base,of American citizens, sorted by ethnicity, by voting patterns, by networking, etc, according to an interview I saw with a committee member. That is chilling. This is the CIA, with files on domestic residents? What the actual ★■◆●?

Yep.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/3156983/ ... abase.html