DescentBB

Some of you may remember a post I made years ago about Michelle Obama wearing 700 snearkers to some charity event. Not a boo out of the loyalist press nor the fecal masses on the left using the social megaphones. Well now we have Ivanka Trump wearing a designer dress to a formal DC traditional event. All they can say is :

Twitter users compared the First Daughter to Marie Antoinette, accused Ivanka of distracting the American public with “something shiny,” and peppered her with claims that she was dancing the night away as “Syrian children die.”

Yeah,, it is alright for someone like Michelle who couldn't afford to wear those "shiny" tennis shoes (probably donated), nor was she accused of walking around in expensive shoes while poor inner city kids got shot over them. the real optics here is how sad sack the leftist memories are and how they use selective amnesia to target people.

lol

Are you referring to this event woody?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/2009/05/01 ... -poor.html

I agree, it's tacky and shows that she was just as out of touch as the rest of every Washington insider since the first president. But Ivanka went a little bit farther in the cost and promotion department which made Michelle's $540 "sneakers" look downright plebeian. So that makes Ivanka even more out of touch with the average working American. So how's that draining the swamp going woody?

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ivanka-trum ... interview/

Ivanka, her father and the rest of the family (except for 10-year-old Barron) appeared on “60 Minutes” Sunday. Ivanka was seated in the front row, wearing a $10,800 gold and diamond bracelet. On Monday, her company sent an email to fashion writers promoting the bracelet, mentioning its appearance on “60 Minutes” and showing a photo from the interview.

Woody you are the literal definition of "bread and circuses" aren't you? Don't worry, those of us with functioning brains will save your drooling ass from fascist assholes. You can thank us later.

Seriously, Trump just put Bannon on his national security council. His personal Goebbels. Either wake the ★■◆● up or shut the ★■◆● up, your choice.

TG, Lincoln pretty well got it right, when he talked about fooling people.......that said, the public is catching on, bigly. That first week of Trumps could not have gone more brutally unless his first week had gone like Lincoln's last one did. Telling numbers:

Just remember TC, that Michelle was the first lady. Remind me again the position Ivanka holds.

You got me there woody. Ivanka doesn't have a role in her father's White House, yet.

I can hear your trump cock sucking all the way to here woodchip.

And remember MO had designer dresses made for her that she couldn't afford to buy and instead wore them gratis (ala Palin?) so the designer would get free advertising(?).

For official events of public or historic significance, such as a state visit, the first lady's clothes may be given as a gift by a designer and accepted on behalf of the U.S. government. They are then stored by the National Archives.''

http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/f ... -1.1811323

Ivanka and her mother can both afford to buy them outright.

who the actual ★■◆● cares about the FORMER FIRST LADY'S outfits?

callmeslick wrote:who the actual ★■◆● cares about the FORMER FIRST LADY'S outfits?

people so shallow and void of any brains whatsoever. It's "clueless" california valley girl bull★■◆●. That's woodchips' new name from now on. Valley Girl. Now watch as he says something like "ugh. whatever. you guys are being libtards, fer sure. gag me with a spoon".

Obviously not people like you and those who criticized Ivanka

who the ★■◆● is Ivanka, and why should I care? Didn't care about Billy Carter, or Hugh Rodham either, by way of consistency.

woodchip wrote:Obviously not people like you and those who criticized Ivanka

alt-righter mentality.