Page 1 of 1

Why not Hillary?

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 1:13 am
by Nightshade
Amazingly, I agree with these guys about the Iraq war fiasco:



...it's also why Hillary lost.

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 1:45 pm
by vision
Just a reminder, President Trump said he wants to take away guns without due process and fantasizes about modeling his presidency after China's new lack of term limits. Given Mrs. Clinton's record as a public servant, it's really hard to imagine her making those same statements. I'm pretty sure this is the definition of "lesser of two evils".

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 1:47 pm
by Top Gun
Remember: it doesn't matter if the president is a fascist piece of ★■◆●, so long as he's our fascist piece of ★■◆●!

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 4:25 pm
by vision
ALSO, WHY THE F-U-C-K ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT HILLARY?

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 4:39 pm
by Top Gun
B-but her emails!

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 4:45 pm
by Tunnelcat
vision wrote: Mon Mar 05, 2018 4:25 pm ALSO, WHY THE F-U-C-K ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT HILLARY?
Because he can't fathom a rationale or reason to support President Traitor Trump and beating the dead Hillary horse is his only recourse. :deadhorse:

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2018 6:38 am
by callmeslick
Image

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2018 7:32 pm
by Burlyman
Yeah, and the only reason Hillary wasn't indicted is because everyone is protecting her :/

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2018 10:17 am
by Tunnelcat
Burlyman wrote: Sat Mar 31, 2018 7:32 pm Yeah, and the only reason Hillary wasn't indicted is because everyone is protecting her :/
Even Queen Hillary had so many warts that her "protectors", as you call them, couldn't hide it from everyone anymore. I certainly didn't like her nor did I vote for her. That's why we unfortunately got the orange haired, oversexed, under-endowed, self-centered, thin-skinned, bully egomaniac who harbors delusions of being so great at his job that everyone will gladly crown him King for life and kiss his butt forever. If he doesn't manage to get the world nuked first that is. :wink:

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 11:46 am
by Burlyman
Actually Hillary was the one who was going to try for WW3, and she's a Luciferian elitist witch, a racist, a total psychopath, a pedophile, an alchemist, a vampire and a cannibal. So which is worse? x_x

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 2:11 pm
by Top Gun
★■◆●ing nutjobs like you?

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 4:59 pm
by Tunnelcat
Burlyman wrote: Mon Apr 09, 2018 11:46 am Actually Hillary was the one who was going to try for WW3, and she's a Luciferian elitist witch, a racist, a total psychopath, a pedophile, an alchemist, a vampire and a cannibal. So which is worse? x_x
Geez Burlyman. You managed to mention in one sentence every right wing nutjob unfounded conspiracy theory ever thrown out into the wild ever since Hillary came into the political spotlight. I don't even like her and rarely defend her, but none of that stuff is even remotely true. Do you ever get out much? :wink:

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 1:56 am
by Burlyman
It's not right-wing, and it's not a theory.

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 1:57 am
by Burlyman
Top Gun wrote: Mon Apr 09, 2018 2:11 pm ★■◆●ing nutjobs like you?
Perhaps dumb young animals like you. Lol

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 11:19 am
by Tunnelcat
Burlyman wrote: Wed Apr 11, 2018 1:56 am It's not right-wing, and it's not a theory.
Racist and elitist are the only descriptions that may be even remotely true about Hillary. But such things as witches, vampires and alchemists have long vanished since the Age of Enlightenment, or do you still live in the age of religious dogma, superstition and fear? The pedophile and cannibal crap IS nothing but one of Alex Jones' twisted brain farts that was responsible for the whole Pizzagate debacle and which was found to be fake. As for her being psychopath, prove it. It think you'd have a far easier time, even as a layman, of showing that Trump suffers from that malady rather than Hillary. Maybe you're confusing sociopath for psychopath. Lying, especially without remorse, is a trait of a sociopath and Hillary has done her fare share of lying. But since most people have lied at one time or another during their lives, I guess that makes us all sociopaths somewhat. Now getting pleasure from of pain and misery of other's and using them for your own gain is the mark of a psychopath. There is ample evidence that Trump loves using people for his own gain or to bolster his own ego, then when they don't perform, he revels making their lives miserable once they're no longer on his side and have outlived their usefulness. Isn't his favorite phrase: "You're fired!"? I think he gets pleasure every time he says that. Then, he loves to see them squirm and fight it out like in some twisted cage match. To him, loyalty is fealty, but he's no king. That also makes him a sadist. :wink:

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 11:28 am
by Xfing
I find it puzzling how everyone's so sure Hillary would have started a war with Russia. I mean, so what if she even said at one point that she would? She may have been lying or pandering to a certain electorate at that point. She's a politician and politicians lie all the time, they rarely make good on promises.

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 11:44 am
by Tunnelcat
Xfing wrote: Wed Apr 11, 2018 11:28 am I find it puzzling how everyone's so sure Hillary would have started a war with Russia. I mean, so what if she even said at one point that she would? She may have been lying or pandering to a certain electorate at that point. She's a politician and politicians lie all the time, they rarely make good on promises.
Well, we sure know that Trump will never start a war with Russia. He has this bromance thing going on with Putin for some unknown reason. :wink: However, Putin is more likely to start a war all by himself because he thinks his dick is bigger than anyone's, no matter who's our president. Putin has shown no compunction about using banned chemical weapons or nerve agents on people he doesn't like in several foreign countries. It's no stretch to presume that he'd use nukes on nations he doesn't like.

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 12:35 pm
by Xfing
Yeah I remember everyone's disappointment when he called an air strike on Syria. Well, except those still in denial or those doubling down :D

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 4:56 pm
by Tunnelcat
We'll see what Trump does with HIS line in the sand. He's called for airstrikes, but whether he follows through, or tells Putin beforehand where the missiles are going to be shot towards because Putin's his buddy, time will tell.

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 7:01 pm
by Burlyman
Tunnelcat wrote: Wed Apr 11, 2018 11:19 am ...such things as witches, vampires and alchemists have long vanished since the Age of Enlightenment, or do you still live in the age of religious dogma, superstition and fear?
Do you really believe that no one practices witchcraft, vampirism, and alchemy anymore?

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2018 1:26 pm
by Tunnelcat
Burlyman wrote: Thu Apr 12, 2018 7:01 pm
Tunnelcat wrote: Wed Apr 11, 2018 11:19 am ...such things as witches, vampires and alchemists have long vanished since the Age of Enlightenment, or do you still live in the age of religious dogma, superstition and fear?
Do you really believe that no one practices witchcraft, vampirism, and alchemy anymore?
Not most modern day, well educated Americans, especially a long time politician sitting in the spotlight like Hillary Clinton. Maybe a few isolated religious cults do that sort of weirdness however. I'm currently in the process of joyfully wiping out a whole bunch of crazy cultists in Far Cry 5 right now. :wink:

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2018 3:17 pm
by Krom
Tunnelcat wrote: Fri Apr 13, 2018 1:26 pm I'm currently in the process of joyfully wiping out a whole bunch of crazy cultists in Far Cry 5 right now. :wink:
x2, FC5 is pretty fun.

Re: Why not Hillary?

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2018 4:51 pm
by Tunnelcat
I've got 7 hours and eight minutes into the game. It's been a blast so far.