Page 1 of 1

Net neutrality is bad?

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2018 7:41 am
by Ferno

Re: Net neutrality is bad?

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:29 am
by Vander
I don't really see this as a net neutrality issue. More like false advertising. Seems like a slam dunk FTC suit if Verizon is going to brand a plan "unlimited" and then impose a limit. Verizon probably falls under the FCC instead of the FTC, though.

Re: Net neutrality is bad?

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2018 4:00 pm
by Tunnelcat
Sitting here blanketed by the suffocating pall of smoke for weeks, Verizon needs to stop being a bunch of greedy whores and quit hampering these hardworking firefighter's efforts to get these fires under control.

Re: Net neutrality is bad?

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2018 8:45 am
by Vander
Vander wrote:I don't really see this as a net neutrality issue. More like false advertising. Seems like a slam dunk FTC suit if Verizon is going to brand a plan "unlimited" and then impose a limit. Verizon probably falls under the FCC instead of the FTC, though.
I didn't recall whether it was the FCC or FTC that regulation of Verizon fell under, but it looks like the FTC is being asked to take this up:

Verizon throttling could trigger FTC investigation of deceptive practices

Re: Net neutrality is bad?

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 8:33 pm
by Tunnelcat
Either Verizon feared an FTC investigation, or instead had a moment of "we better fix our public image before our shareholders revolt", because they fixed the problem.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/201 ... -response/

Re: Net neutrality is bad?

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 10:56 pm
by Ferno
I'm almost willing to guarantee the former, because in their minds they figured it would be cheaper to give unlimited than spend the millions in court to fight this.