DescentBB

Lets see how this one plays out

How's that? Nothing political about it so far. The driver may have been fleeing from a crime and mowed over people with his car doing it. The Ahmaud Arbery case will be far more telling. 3 good ol' boys murder a black jogger who happened to be seen snooping around a house under construction, something that other white people were also caught doing. None of them took or disturbed anything, at least to die for. Yet another vigilante case as well.

I see you are deflecting to something else that looks more promising for the nut jobs to riot over

He may be a black guy, but he killed kids who where marching in a parade while driving away from a scene of domestic violence he was involved in. No one will protest against his arrest and conviction. Kid killers always become pariahs no matter what race they are.

Woody just lost his half-chub when he found out that the driver wasn't Muslim.

Tunnelcat wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 8:22 pm He may be a black guy, but he killed kids who where marching in a parade while driving away from a scene of domestic violence he was involved in. No one will protest against his arrest and conviction. Kid killers always become pariahs no matter what race they are.

Not that he was a black but rather a ex-con with a 50 page rap sheet who woke approved DA's let out on low bail. Not just low misdemeanors, but full blown felonies. So stop thinking all people of color are oppressed So you are saying if the kid hadn't died, he should of got off?

That unfortunately happens all over the country and not just with people of color. A white judge just let a white rapist off with probation because that judge didn't want to ruin that poor young man's life and thought that probation was enough of a sentence. Well I say to that, bull★■◆●. He did the crime, he needs to do the time. So don't dump that "woke" crap on me. This is not a race problem but a justice problem. I see you didn't mention that little recent injustice here either.

https://www.thecut.com/2021/11/judge-sa ... rison.html

The black guy who hit his wife AND ran over her for good measure, then went out and ran over people in a parade, killing and maiming them, deserves to be locked up for life. He is 100% guilty and an ex con who committed a heinous crime where the evidence against him is ironclad. I only gave the child comment because killing children seems more heinous of a crime and more likely to garner people's emotions for harsh justice. If BLM is stupid enough to protest any harsh sentence this jerk gets, they need to pack up and go home because they've just cut off their noses to spite their faces in the cause of furthering racial justice.

woodchip wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:07 amwoke approved DA

LOL! Another square on the propaganda BINGO card. inb4 CRT.

vision wrote: ↑Thu Nov 25, 2021 10:00 am

woodchip wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:07 amwoke approved DA

LOL! Another square on the propaganda BINGO card. inb4 CRT.

When did you become a full blown idiot?

Well lets see what is coming out now:

Multiple witnesses are claiming the drive was zig zaging in what looked like he was aiming for people.
Suspect intentionally plowed SUV into Wisconsin holiday parade, police sa
https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/wa ... ll-brooks/

Then we have statements he made:
""LEARNED ND TAUGHT BEHAVIOR!! so when we start bakk knokkin white people TF out ion wanna hear it...the old white ppl 2, KNOKK DEM TF OUT!! PERIOD..," Brooks wrote on Facebook on June 9, 2020'"

So he intentionally murdered people and he is a avowed racist. I'll wait until his trial before making any final conclusion .

woodchip wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:18 pmWhen did you become a full blown idiot?

You're the one here spouting off propaganda buzzwords. What exactly makes the DA "woke" and do you even know the history of that word in this context? Because if you did, you'd realize you're using it in the way the right wing propaganda machine wants you to. Not a good look, woody. Not a good look at all.

vision wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:58 pm

woodchip wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:18 pmWhen did you become a full blown idiot?

You're the one here spouting off propaganda buzzwords. What exactly makes the DA "woke" and do you even know the history of that word in this context? Because if you did, you'd realize you're using it in the way the right wing propaganda machine wants you to. Not a good look, woody. Not a good look at all.

"But we will only succeed if we reject the growing pressure to retreat into cynicism and hopelessness. … We have a moral obligation to "stay woke," take a stand and be active; challenging injustices and racism in our communities and fighting hatred and discrimination wherever it rises."
From the Merriam Dictionary

So he was not taking a stand or challenging injustice. Maybe you should check on what you are talking,

woodchip wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 1:11 pm So he was not taking a stand or challenging injustice. Maybe you should check on what you are talking,

This last post of yours is incoherent, can you elaborate?

vision wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 1:13 pm

woodchip wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 1:11 pm So he was not taking a stand or challenging injustice. Maybe you should check on what you are talking,

This last post of yours is incoherent, can you elaborate?

as I thought, your reading comprehension is sadly lacking. I"m used to talking to adults.

Or you could just complete your own sentences like a normal person.

Krom wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 4:35 pm Or you could just complete your own sentences like a normal person.

The few functional neurons he has left are misfiring again.

woodchip wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 4:26 pmas I thought, your reading comprehension is sadly lacking. I"m used to talking to adults.

This is the question I asked you: "What exactly makes the DA "woke" and do you even know the history of that word in this context?"

Your response was to post a quote from California Congresswoman Barbara Lee and "...he was not taking a stand or challenging injustice."

This is contradictory. If being woke means to "take a stand and be active; challenging injustices and racism" but the DA "was not taking a stand or challenging injustice," he's not woke is he? Do you even know what you are talking about????

He who fights and runs away, he's gone Jim.

Sooo, how 'bout them Mets.