DescentBB

Ronald Rowe is a clone of ms Cheetos.

Nacho cheese again.

Do you know woody that no head of the Secret Service has ever been fired for an assassination attempt on any president or government official ever, at least that I could find, until Trumpkins Maxipad gets winged in the ear by a bullet. He wasn't even killed. JFK was and yet, the head of the S.S. kept his job back then. Go figure.

There were different policies in place back then.

Line of sight in particular.

Oh come on Spidey. That's BS. That book repository building had line of sight with JFK's head. Hinckley walked right up to Reagan and fired. Policies seem to change after the fact, never before. They're reacting, not being proactive as times change. Trump was making a lot of enemies once he got into politics, so they should've changed tactics long ago knowing full well someone might take a pot shot at him. Yet still, no head of S.S. has been fired in the past, why? It wasn't even until 1901 that the Secret Service was tasked with protecting the president instead of going after money counterfeiters.

Now the S.S. has requested Trump not hold outdoor rallies. Think he'll follow their recommendation?

It's not BS the line of site policy was adapted soon after the JFK assassination.

Don't believe me...well the story was on the most trusted news outlet PBS's The News Hour just last night, you can probably look it up if you want.

I believe you Spidey. But I reiterate. The head of the Secret Service was NOT fired back then when a president was successfully assassinated. This time, the assassination attempt failed, yet the head of the S.S. is forced to resign. I firmly believe she should've resigned right after the attempt on Trump. But I also believe the head of the S.S. back when Kennedy was killed and Reagan was shot should've both resigned. I'm not quite old enough to remember the political fallout with JFK, but it didn’t rise to the point that either man was forced to resign. Taking responsibility should be a given, not an afterthought, no matter the position. This whole episode stinks.

Well, the point being is the head of the S.S. was forced to resign because of a massive breach of policy, that policy was not in effect at the time of JFK's assassination therefore there was no cause to require the resignation.

You shouldn't fire someone if they didn't do anything wrong...unless you are looking for a scapegoat.

Uh, the mission of the Secret Service is to protect the president. If that president is killed or even attacked on your watch, either you resign or get fired, because you failed to do your job, protect the president. Maybe if that threat was stated reality when hired, policy would be taken more seriously and updated more frequently to reflect current threats by any leader who's appointed to oversee the Secret Service.

So by now you may have (but probable not) heard the grilling of Rowe by the Senate committee tasked to do so. Under testimony Rowe said they had no info other than there was a suspicious character moving around yet about 3 min. before the shots, one of the victims has cell phone footage of the shooter moving along the roof and when he goes prone, you can see his head appear over the ridge line of the roof. Now if a participant could see him, why did the snipers see him: https://www.usatoday.com/story/graphics ... 399097007/ First photo shows snipers looking in the right direction and I would have to say the optics he has are far better than a cell phone's. So the question is why the sniper had to wait until Crooks got off 8 shots before he was killed.

Now this is from Bongino (who was a USSS agent on presidential protection details) and if you want to ignore him and get your info somewhere else from someone who is afraid of losing their pension or job, feel free. Where were and when did the counter surveillance units (CSU) show up? Apparently just that morning instead of earlier that week . Where are their reports? When will the actual USSS agents on site testify under oath (this includes the snipers). There is a whistleblower who apparently says Rowe had reduced CSU for Trump events though Rowe testified he hadn't.
Bongino states as it looks more and more like Trump will win, More whistleblowers will come forward for not only this failure, but why are USSS email's missing regarding Jan. 6th pipe bomb episode. Will we learn more about cocaine gate at the white house. Enough for now because those of you who want to remain ignorant and use derogatory language will do so. There are a few of you who may be curious and want to post about it.

Weird story, MAGAt.

My, my. Where is Bongino obtaining his information about Trump winning? Be that as it may, according the the head of the Heritage Foundation, they've already gotten some of their Project 2025 plans going behind the Dems backs. They'd better be careful. Not everyone in this country likes that crap and will take extreme exception. If Trump's performance at the National Association of Black Journalists is any indication however, he's toast among black women since his latent racism and bald facing lying keeps creeping out his pie hole. He's already toast among most women with more than 2 brain cells in their head. I think to qualify to be a female member of MAGA, you either have to have zero brain cells and/or hold onto the Bible like an anchor. And time will tell if the interim S.S. leadership learns from this herculean mistake with Trump. You just won't be satisfied until some stupid MAGA suck-up gets that post anyway.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-nabj-b ... ac2ec739e5

Tunnelcat wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 3:35 pm My, my. Where is Bongino obtaining his information about Trump winning? Be that as it may, according the the head of the Heritage Foundation, they've already gotten some of their Project 2025 plans going behind the Dems backs. They'd better be careful. Not everyone in this country likes that crap and will take extreme exception. If Trump's performance at the National Association of Black Journalists is any indication however, he's toast among black women since his latent racism and bald facing lying keeps creeping out his pie hole. He's already toast among most women with more than 2 brain cells in their head. I think to qualify to be a female member of MAGA, you either have to have zero brain cells and/or hold onto the Bible like an anchor. And time will tell if the interim S.S. leadership learns from this herculean mistake with Trump. You just won't be satisfied until some stupid MAGA suck-up gets that post anyway.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-nabj-b ... ac2ec739e5

Why are you so fixated on Trump. As to MAGA females, at least they know they are females and don't have problem with having babies. There will come a time when the liberals will abort themselves out of existence and America will be the better for it.

I'm fixated on Trump because he and his nutty followers are a threat to my existence. As for MAGA females, I hope they like being relegated to the home pooping out babies right and left, cooking and cleaning for the rest of their lives, while their husbands are free to beat the crap out of them because a jackass like Vance believes women need to stay in abusive marriages, no divorce. No contraception either, so lots of kids. Then this country will be full of even more latchkey kids who are bored and get into trouble, or worse, kids who are abused and not wanted by their parents or even sold into sex trafficking for cash or drugs, because, you know, the state just can't force people to be happy willing parents or make enough money to support them. Even worse, once Republicans kill any type of subsidized or assisted healthcare, most parents won't be able to afford to keep their kids healthy either, let alone themselves. MAGAt's are so full of ★■◆●, they stink.

TC: You don't have to tell him a damn thing. It's none of his business and he's just baiting you.

He already knows why.

No, I want him to justify what his MAGAt's really want for the women of this country, women who broke their shackles of male domination in the 1960's, and why it would be good for us women to go back. Because I see plenty of "normal" families the are so screwed up, nothing will help them or their suffering kids, not even the state and especially the state. All these bastards want is male power.

Well it is going on week 2 and has Rowe given names to the Senate Committee liked he promised?...you know, like in "Days not weeks" . Oh and now it has come to light the SS agent in charge of site security was too inexperienced for the job

Maybe real life has just gotten sick of conservatives constant performative bull★■◆● and has quit putting any real time into it.

And now we find out the site agent was incompetent, "One whistleblower with direct knowledge of the event alleges to my office that this lead site agent was well-known in campaign circles as lacking competence and experience in the role," Hawley wrote in a letter to Acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe on Monday.

"This specific allegation follows similar public reports that this agent was 'new' to the local field office and had 'relatively little experience.' The whistleblower alleges that this individual was, as part of securing the site, specifically responsible for line-of-sight concerns," Hawley continued"
Just remember kiddies, it could of been your fav pick for POTUS also.

Getting a headache when the narrative is not to your liking?

You know, I believe in giving someone a chance. The head of the SS was pushed out and she's the one who screwed up. I think Rowe deserves the chance to make changes and fix things. And the headache is yours for constantly posting about this like you want some sort of revenge. Are your fingers getting tired yet?

Well, Rowe and his S.S. have a lot more house cleaning to do and it may include him at this point. What a bunch of arrogant idiots. These guys were in charge of Kamala's detail this time, not Trump's too, so there's an endemic problem with the whole service.

https://nypost.com/2024/08/11/us-news/s ... ris-event/