DescentBB

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:04 pm**

Click here

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:25 pm**

It looks like a....Death Star!

Could it be?

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:27 pm**

ROTFLMAO!! very nice

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:49 pm**

I guess its no longer in a galaxy far far away...

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:54 pm**

Dark Falcon wrote:It looks like a....Death Star!

I DO NOT POSSIBLY SEE HOW THAT COULD BE A DEATH STAR

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 3:01 pm**

I saw that the other day. Very interesting... I won't believe it till I see it blow up a planet, though.

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 3:02 pm**

Vertigo, you'd better go see the original Star Wars. The crater with the dimple looks alot like the focusing array on the death star.

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 3:28 pm**

Dude, ever hear of the asteroid field? It already blew up a planet!

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:50 pm**

What really amazes me is that moon took that hit and remained in orbit.... 0_o

------------------------------------------------------

M-O-O-N ...... that spells "Kansas City"!

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 6:04 pm**

Mebbe it didn't remain in orbit... maybe it was like that when Saturn captured it, having been knocked out of orbit previously?

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 7:01 pm**

That's killer!

80 miles wide? That's not very wide, that moon must be real small. Kind of a surprise it's intact.

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 7:46 pm**

Heh... first thing I noticed when I came into this topic was that a MOD, esp. one whom harshly criticizes ANYONE that doesn't embed their link, chose not to embed a link that's OBVIOUSLY going to be too big.

Back on Topic... am I the only one that sees a very large breast with a NICE nipple on it?

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:15 pm**

*Cues up the Imperial March theme from Star Wars*

Thats no moon...its a space station!

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:18 pm**

Duper wrote:M-O-O-N ...... that spells "Kansas City"!

I resent that remark.

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:29 pm**

Heh, figured something in the system would look like that.

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:46 pm**

Testiculese wrote:That's killer!

80 miles wide? That's not very wide, that moon must be real small. Kind of a surprise it's intact.

As I recall.. there is one heck of a stressfracture on the other side.

Nitrofox125 wrote:Mebbe it didn't remain in orbit... maybe it was like that when Saturn captured it, having been knocked out of orbit previously?

yea.. I was thinkin of this too.

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:16 pm**

Though the fact that it's still round does show that it pretty much remained intact all of it's life... mebbe the impact formed when it was in the last stages of it's creation... though I don't think that would work out...

[edit]LMFAO @ the nipple comment[/edit]

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:36 am**

LOL... yes, that is a remarkable picture...

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2004 5:08 am**

Arent you dead?

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2004 8:55 am**

woodchip wrote:Vertigo, you'd better go see the original Star Wars. The crater with the dimple looks alot like the focusing array on the death star.

wow. just wow.

I am in awe that you did not detect the sarcasm in my post.

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2004 11:11 am**

Well, with some of the dopes we have running around...

That or you were thought to be younger than you are.

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2004 11:45 am**

Stupid wrote:Back on Topic... am I the only one that sees a very large breast with a NICE nipple on it?

Supple

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2004 11:52 am**

Stupid wrote:Heh... first thing I noticed when I came into this topic was that a MOD, esp. one whom harshly criticizes ANYONE that doesn't embed their link, chose not to embed a link that's OBVIOUSLY going to be too big.

The link is actually just at the limit. It doesn't make me scroll, and I'm the one who usually gets up in arms about links making me scroll... so no, it's not "obviously" too big. If it was 2 characters longer, then it would be too big.

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:14 pm**

Lothar wrote:
Stupid wrote:Heh... first thing I noticed when I came into this topic was that a MOD, esp. one whom harshly criticizes ANYONE that doesn't embed their link, chose not to embed a link that's OBVIOUSLY going to be too big.
The link is actually just at the limit. It doesn't make me scroll, and I'm the one who usually gets up in arms about links making me scroll... so no, it's not "obviously" too big. If it was 2 characters longer, then it would be too big.

and besides, mods can bend the rules if they want to.

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2004 1:33 pm**

Sage wrote:and besides, mods can bend the rules if they want to.

[Shaft]You're damn right![/Shaft]

Seriously though Stupid, I actually checked to see if it would make people scroll before I posted it. Perhaps you should re-read that announcement that I made some time ago. I never said embedding links all the time was compulsory. My only beef is with links that are so freakin' long that they make people scroll to read posts. Now I'm viewing at 1024x768 with zoom set to 100%. If its making you scroll I'll be glad to edit it.

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2004 10:08 pm**

[/rant=long] That link's easily larger than some of the others that I've seen bitched about, and YES, it does make me scroll. It doesn't matter much, though. I am unfortunate in the fact that I have a rather small monitor, and it would be an incredible eye strain to try to read print that is at 1024x768. When/if I ever buy a new computer, I'll have a nice, pretty 19" monitor that would work out much better at 1024x768. I had a real beef with the GGL because they don't take into consideration that there are people that play on the GGL that can't have their resolution higher than 800x600 and still be able to read without a magnifying glass. The GGL site is designed that you can't even scroll over to the sides in order to sign in, so I had to switch my screen (to 1024x768) and find something along the lines of a magnifying glass every time I wanted to log in. Of course, that doesn't matter now either, because D3 is so in the gutter that we can't even get 10 people to regularly play 1on1s in D3 (if we can even get 10 to regularly play D3 at all). [/rant]
P.S. I realize that noone liked the GGL, anyway. Just not the right type of system to try to get a small number of people to play 1on1s.

Semi-On-Topic: If that IS the death star, then that would mean that things from our Sci-Fi movies are real, just REALLY REALLY old. So, if we're finding out now that the Death Star was real, it'll only be a matter of years (like 20) that Aliens (from the movie of the same title) will come and invade Earth and kill us all. I may as well just off myself now, because I DO NOT want to be alive when that happens....

Posted: **Thu Jul 29, 2004 9:25 pm**

Embedded for you. Happy now?

Posted: **Thu Jul 29, 2004 9:39 pm**

I would like to take this kodac moment, to say that mimas is the 7th of the 31 moons of Saturn.

Posted: **Fri Jul 30, 2004 8:31 pm**

Yay, thanks MD.... If that moon is Mimas, and there are 31 moons... then I just need to get 30 other volunteers that are going to the ChiLAN to take a group picture with me... and I will write "MIMASS" on my bum and we can all moon the camera...

Posted: **Fri Jul 30, 2004 10:23 pm**

THAT would definitely be an image that Dark Falcon couldn't handle.

Posted: **Sat Jul 31, 2004 3:22 am**

hey cool, you can verify this creater thingy in Celestia.

aint technology neato

DescentBB

Holy crap! The Death Star is REAL!

Holy crap! The Death Star is REAL!