Some bada$$ CGI work here **Working link now**
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 12:26 pm
not working for me
'page cannot be found'
DescentBB
The Descent Bulletin Board
https://descentbb.net/
Some bada$$ CGI work here **Working link now**
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 1:52 pm
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 1:54 pm
fourohone
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:51 pm
404
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:03 pm
ditto
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:13 pm
so many hits it dies 
I lurb teh internet
I lurb teh internet
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 9:17 pm
LOL ... dead linky dinky ...
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 10:53 pm
bump
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 11:07 pm
pretty good
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 9:52 am
meh...thats the last thing we need. Cool video though.
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:54 am
Can I have one? :D:D
:D:DPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 4:42 pm
That was great. Thanks Stress. Very well done.
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 4:50 pm
that...was hot.
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:05 pm
...yea, that's right .. he's a gay robot.Topher wrote:that...was hot.
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 6:18 pm
pretty cool. can anyone say I,Robot 
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 6:50 pm
Very nice CGI. Totally crap design of a robot - but nice CGI.
Somehow, I think a police robot is going to be covered in 10mm armour, will not carry a weapon, have 360 degree vision, (Two eyes suck!) and be substantially larger than the one depicted.
Also, somehow, I can't accept a police robot firing at human beings. There's just NO WAY anyone is going to accept that. A robot has no moral code which could permit it to decide when (or who!) to shoot. (Remember ED-109 in robocop?)
Robots are great recon devices - but leave the shooting to the humans please! Dumb-a$s CGI designers. Brilliant at rendering, stupid as a door-post in design. I think Jerry Bruckheimer might have been involved...
Somehow, I think a police robot is going to be covered in 10mm armour, will not carry a weapon, have 360 degree vision, (Two eyes suck!) and be substantially larger than the one depicted.
Also, somehow, I can't accept a police robot firing at human beings. There's just NO WAY anyone is going to accept that. A robot has no moral code which could permit it to decide when (or who!) to shoot. (Remember ED-109 in robocop?)
Robots are great recon devices - but leave the shooting to the humans please! Dumb-a$s CGI designers. Brilliant at rendering, stupid as a door-post in design. I think Jerry Bruckheimer might have been involved...
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 7:08 pm
you need to go shoot yourself
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 7:22 pm
Obligatory correct-Mobius's-grammar post:
DISCLAIMER: This post contributed just as much to the thread as Mobius's; that is, it did not contribute at all.
Wanna check it? Send it to your friend the copy editor; he'll vouch for me.Mobius wrote:Also, somehow, I can't accept a police robot firing at human beings. There's just NO WAY anyone is going to accept that. A robot has no moral code which could permit it to decide when (or whom!) to shoot.
DISCLAIMER: This post contributed just as much to the thread as Mobius's; that is, it did not contribute at all.
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 7:26 pm
The USA has already armed the remotely operated "recon" planes and destroyed tanks with hellfire missiles. Cruise missiles are essentually flying robotic bombs. They have already made a lot of progress in the transition to machines fighting instead of humans.
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 7:58 pm
You sure that's CG?
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 8:00 pm
That was the ED-209. Remember... YOU HAVE 2 SECONDS TO COMPLY!Mobius wrote:(Remember ED-109 in robocop?)
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 8:09 pm
I'm thinkin Nitro that it might be super-imposed CGI, kinda like golem.
And Mobius, if I heard the vid correctly, this is a remote patrol bot. That is, it's a camera with legs for cops. A drone.
Still a wicked vid. I love that shot where he takes a hit.
And Mobius, if I heard the vid correctly, this is a remote patrol bot. That is, it's a camera with legs for cops. A drone.
Still a wicked vid. I love that shot where he takes a hit.
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 11:06 pm
Heh. That was great. Very high quality. It looked practically real