Page 1 of 1

The presidents bulge

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 6:57 pm
by Fusion pimp
Scrappleface has the scoop on the bulge. He cited this report:

"Object Under Bush Jacket Identified: 'It's a Spine'

"(2004-10-11) -- A forensic scientist studying photographic evidence has identified an object which caused a bump on the back of a suit jacket worn by President George Bush during his first debate with John Forbes Kerry.

"'It's a spine,' said the unnamed scientist. 'The president's backbone, in a sense, was showing during his debate with Mr. Kerry.'

"Similar images of Mr. Kerry showed 'no comparable spinal features.'

"When asked about the new evidence, Mr. Kerry said, 'I had a spine when I defended this country as a young man, and I will have one again when I defend her as president of the United States.'"

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:27 pm
by Will Robinson
ROFLOL!
That makes me think the reason the lefties say Bush swaggers is because they don't know what it's like to walk with a pair of testicles between their legs!

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 11:54 pm
by roid
i saw that bulge on his back in the news last night.

it was very interesting indeed. but he sucked in that debate anyway didn't he? so maybe whatever it was, it wasn't turned on :D

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 7:40 pm
by Avder
I dunno, if he was wired wouldnt we have seen oh...a wire? Also, he would have probably talked a bit more intelligently.I find it hard to believe that he was wired and whoever was talking into his ears didnt tell him to say more intelligent things :P

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:19 pm
by BlueFlames
Well, you see Avder, as part of the vast, liberal media conspiracy, Cheney was bribed to make Bush Jr. look like an idiot by saying stupid stuff through the wire, in order to get Kerry elected. ;)

Actually, looking at the picture of the 'wire', if that's his spine, one of two things should or must be true:

1) Bush Jr. should be a quadriplegic, because that's not a natural line for a spine.

2) Bush Jr. was originally a two-headed beast, and they accidentally cut the head with the brain off. :P

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:41 pm
by Will Robinson
It's probably the top rear section of a bullet proof vest that presidents wear from time to time, but that's a detail that is never officially confirmed so as to not inspire gunmen to practice for headshots.

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:50 pm
by Kyouryuu
I think it's probably a bulletproof vest. You'd probably wear one too if you were in his shoes in this day and age.

Either that or some hella' big 1980s-style shoulder pads worthy of Miami Vice...

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:30 pm
by roid

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:44 pm
by index_html
Looking at those pics, I think Jim Lehrer was inquiring whether President Bush prefers "Bro" or "Manzier".

"Support Bush" takes on a whole new meaning.

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:47 pm
by Top Gun
index_html wrote:Looking at those pics, I think Jim Lehrer was inquiring whether President Bush prefers "Bro" or "Manzier".

"Support Bush" takes on a whole new meaning.
That was a truly great episode :P.

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:37 pm
by Lothar
it wouldn't surprise me if he was wearing a wire, too -- just, probably not to get help in the debate. Is it really all that unlikely the president would have some way to hear from Secret Service? And, as mentioned before, is it really all that unlikely he'd be wearing a bulletproof vest?

I think this is like the Kerry pen thing -- it's not particularly an issue, unless someone can produce something more substantial than a shot of a bulge in the back of a jacket.

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:09 am
by Ferno
I thought you were talking about that bulge on top of his neck.

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:33 am
by Zuruck
why would he be using an earpiece for the secret service? bulletproof vest? is the security at these debates that shabby to wear he has to wear kevlar indoors in a controlled facility surrounded by hundreds of cops?

eh, read something about it somewhere how he said, while no one else was talking to him, "quiet, let me finish" or something. he wasn't being interupted nor was this time finished, so I don't know. it means absolutely nothing to me.

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:52 pm
by Pebkac
If he were really wired, you wouldn't have seen anything. Why would a man with access to the most advanced technology on the planet use a device about the size of a walkman? Can the GOP really not get any equipment newer than 1985?

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:04 pm
by Will Robinson
Zuruck wrote:eh, read something about it somewhere how he said, while no one else was talking to him, "quiet, let me finish" or something. he wasn't being interupted nor was this time finished, so I don't know. it means absolutely nothing to me.
Yea and I read something about the easter bunny but I was like three years old at the time so I've got an excuse.

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:35 pm
by Zuruck
and you think your idea of him wearing a bulletproof vest in a place like a presidential debate made any sense?

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:57 pm
by Will Robinson
Zuruck wrote:and you think your idea of him wearing a bulletproof vest in a place like a presidential debate made any sense?
Well considering I got the idea from Steve Porter, a local guy who used to be a whitehouse pool reporter for CBS during the Reagan years...who said basically the same thing, that since Reagan was shot most of the time the presidents wear a vest in public places...yes there is security *inside* the event but as is the case with Reagan they have to leave the arena and get to the car which means open air...suburban enviroment...impossible to verify all angles are covered....

He seems to know what he's talking about.
Tell me, where did you get your theory from?

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
by Fusion pimp
A bit of info: Bullet proof vests aren't really bullet proof. ;)
They will stop most handgun projectiles, though.

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:24 pm
by Ympakt
The best I can see with those pics at that angle makes it look like nothing more than a fold in the fabic. Even if it isn't just a fold in the fabric and it is a transceiver of some sort, is Bush incapable of answering his own questions (bit like cheating on a test, isn't it?), or is he not bright enough to place the alleged "device" someplace less conspicuous; say, on the belt or in an inside coat pocket?

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:21 pm
by woodchip
Fusion pimp wrote:A bit of info: Bullet proof vests aren't really bullet proof. ;)
They will stop most handgun projectiles, though.
Depends on if they are kevlar or ceramic.

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:38 pm
by Ympakt
Depends on if they are kevlar or ceramic.
Even ceramic is not indestructible to certain calibers, bullet types, or close range.

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2004 5:17 pm
by Birdseye
Viagra Patch

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2004 8:24 pm
by CORD
Actually, it's his battery pack.

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2004 8:32 pm
by Kyouryuu
CORD wrote:Actually, it's his battery pack.
Unless Bush is a robot, I doubt a battery pack would be that huge on someone. Most of the microphone packs the press use are about the size of a Sony Walkman.

Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 1:02 pm
by Fusion pimp
Woody,
they will both stop handgun bullets, but niether of them will stop a .308... 06, etc.

B-