DescentBB

CNN report

One word: Ick

OMG I do not want to know the reason behind that method!!! Thats just sick

No kidding. Nasty.

Sounds a bit fishy!!! I ain't never heard of it.

And Catholic priests have precisely what to do with this CNN story? To that point I am given to understand that sexual abberrations (as here implied) are about the same % in the Catholic priesthood as they are in the general population. I'm not trying to absolve pedophiles - just clarifying.

im ganna go puke now thank ya

that ain't kosher.

Only if the milk and meat is ingested at the same time!!

oy vey

As Dissent said, what exactly do you mean by that thread title?

Wow.. not only does the thread title play on unfair stereotypes of Catholics, it also implies that this kind of (deviant?) behavior is somehow typical of Judaic practice...

hmmm... I don't see any foul play, just unhigenic play. The guy obviously isn't a sexual preditor, if you ask me.

The purpose of the title was to shock you into reading, then replying to the thread. I guess it worked pretty good huh?

I don't get it... with his mouth?

[spoiler]Yes, apparently he licked the blood off of the infant boys penís. Perhaps he could even take the whole thing into his mouth and swallowed. Herpies can be transfered thru saliva. So obviously, the infant boys got herpies from the saliva he deposited on their penís when he licked or sucked off the blood.[/spoiler]

There? Happy now?

and some people that don't believe in religion are called heathens?

Seriously...some of the these weird practices you hear about need to be chronicled in Ripley's and left behind. I don't know whos worse though. The guy sucking the blood from childrens penii or the parents that let him do it? Crazy alss world we live in.

Blegh. All I can say is blegh.

I dont see what purpose circumsicion even has in todays world. It has absolutely no medical value to say the least.

all religions are cults

/me vomits

/me follows ferno

oh comeon .. this Really suprises you?? You guys have been on the net for years; you know how sick some ppl are.



...btw.. no WAY do i think this is ok. I don't remember reading this practice in the Tora.

You're all prudes.

duper: suprised, no. sickened, yes.

Ferno wrote:duper: suprised, no. sickened, yes.

point, set, match.

Duper wrote:I don't remember reading this practice in the Tora.

Well i asked around, and as a religious practice there definatly ain't nothing true about it.

Avder wrote:I dont see what purpose circumsicion even has in todays world. It has absolutely no medical value to say the least.

It does actually... but only in certain cases...

These people do so because... basically, it is Jewish tradition.

But obviously this method doesn't work very well. At all.

TheCops wrote:that ain't kosher.

OMG! ROTFL!

Avder wrote:I dont see what purpose circumsicion even has in todays world. It has absolutely no medical value to say the least.

Hey, some women like to peel their bananna before they eat it, some don't.

Circumcision does have medical benefits, but nowadays since people bathe regularly, the medical risks are pretty small.

name one dc.

I don't know about medical benefits, but (and I excuse the crudity) I'm pretty glad that willy is free.

Turtlenecks are sooo cheesy Europorn. I'm glad (sorta) someone 'splained how the blood mixed. I was thinking the mohel must have been gnawing off the foreskin. ::fear & revulsion::

Ah yes, the age old practice of genital mutilation. Do it to girls in Africa, and Amnesty International is all over you. Do it to boys in New York, and nobody cares.

I don't think that circumcision has a single legitimate purpose today outside of tradition.

Personally I think the practice it cruel. I would never do that to my son.

Welcome to the world boy. There are many wonderfull things to learn and experience. But first, let me cut off part of your genitalia.

If you do it to girls in Africa, you also make it almost impossible for them to experience orgasm later in life. I don't know of any negative effects on boys, aside from the immediate pain and the possibility of the aforementioned rabbi-messes-up complications.

Circumcision is no longer medically helpful (as long as you bathe regularly) and it's pretty uncommon in most of the world now, aside from the US. I don't see any reason for it if you're not Jewish. But I also don't see any reason for Jews to stop doing it (outside of "your Messiah already came, and this sign of covenant is no longer necessary" -- but good luck convincing them of that!)

It makes sense that Lobber was the originator of this post.

Ferno wrote:name one dc.

DCrazy wrote:Circumcision does have medical benefits, but nowadays since people bathe regularly, the medical risks are pretty small.

Meaning that the primary medical benefits of circumcision (decreased risk of infection) are minimized.

One benefit is that circumsized willy's eventually become quite desensitized so they can make love, on average, for a longer time. It's a benefit that the female of the species takes full pleasure in.

This is not an old wives tale.

Lothar wrote:If you do it to girls in Africa, you also make it almost impossible for them to experience orgasm later in life. I don't know of any negative effects on boys, aside from the immediate pain and the possibility of the aforementioned rabbi-messes-up complications.

Circumcision is no longer medically helpful (as long as you bathe regularly) and it's pretty uncommon in most of the world now, aside from the US. I don't see any reason for it if you're not Jewish. But I also don't see any reason for Jews to stop doing it (outside of "your Messiah already came, and this sign of covenant is no longer necessary" -- but good luck convincing them of that!)

Mutilation is still mutilation regardless of the outcome. In the case of circumcision, it is mutilation against the will of the one being mutilated. That is just plain wrong in my book. Besides, circumcision can make it harder for the man to reach orgasm as the head becomes desensitized. It is a big enough issue that there are medical procedures now that allow the man to "grow" his foreskin back by stretching the skin that remains so it covers the head.

Back when Mrs Dedman was pregnant, I did a lot of research into circumcision. I wanted to know what the pros and cons to it were in case we had a boy. Through the research, I concluded that it is a barbaric act and has no purpose other than to fulfill a religious ceremony today.

For those of you seeking employment, there are openings in your local circumcision ward.

Pay is 5 skins a week with a chance to get a-head.

I know...old