DescentBB

If it wern't for Camilla...Diana would still be alive.

Howdya work that out Woody.

Lee Harvey Oswald's child became a member of the paparazzi.

Flabby Chick wrote:Howdya work that out Woody.

Well, aside from Cop's sophmoric reply, I was trying to convey a morality conversation on the pratfalls of infidelity and the subsequent casualties therein. If the next king of england wanted a more cerebral life's mate why did he marry Diana? This alone may say volumes about the man. If Charles would have been true to his vows, then Diana would never have been in France being chased by sepia induced papparazzi. Instead she would have been home being a mother to her two boys. Why the world press would waste any airtime covering this story is beyond me.

The marrage between him and Diana was forced. They were never meant for each other. Charles all the time wanted to marry Camilla but his "mum" would not allow that and instead wanted him to marry a virgin.

Im sick of all this "its hip to bash Camilla" bandwagon. Their lives were screwed up because they were not making the decisions on their marrage, but rather it was done by someone else. Read up more (no, not the CNN accounts) and learn for yourself.

Top, Camilla was already married to someone else at the time of Charles & Diana's wedding so I don't think Charles was "forced" into anything.

are you talking along the lines of thiswoodchip?

just... whatif events happened this way instead of that way? if history were rewritten could Diana possibly have died in a flock of angry penguins?

Charles was a cold fish. ...er .. is. .... likes horses.

WTF??