Page 1 of 1

Intel sleeping in the DRM bed....

Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 12:08 am
by MD-2389
source
Intel quietly adds DRM to new chips
Friday 27 May 2005 - 11:02


Microsoft and the entertainment industry's holy grail of controlling copyright through the motherboard has moved a step closer with Intel Corp. now embedding digital rights management within in its latest dual-core processor Pentium D and accompanying 945 chipset.

Officially launched worldwide on the May 26, the new offerings come DRM-enabled and will, at least in theory, allow copyright holders to prevent unauthorized copying and distribution of copyrighted materials from the motherboard rather than through the operating system as is currently the case.

While Intel steered clear of mentioning the new DRM technology at its Australian launch of the new products, Intel's Australian technical manager Graham Tucker publicly confirmed Microsoft-flavored DRM technology will be a feature of Pentium D and 945.

"[The] 945g [chipset] supports DRM, it helps implement Microsoft's DRM ... but it supports DRM looking forward," Tucker said, adding the DRM technology would not be able to be applied retrospectively to media or files that did not interoperate with the new technology.

However, Tucker ducked questions regarding technical details of how embedded DRM would work saying it was not in the interests of his company to spell out how the technology in the interests of security.

The situation presents an interesting dilemma for IT security managers as they may now be beholden to hardware-embedded security over which they have little say, information or control.

Conversely, Intel is heavily promoting what it calls "active management technology" (AMT) in the new chips as a major plus for system administrators and enterprise IT. Understood to be a sub-operating system residing in the chip's firmware, AMT will allow administrators to both monitor or control individual machines independent of an operating system.

Additionally, AMT also features what Intel calls "IDE redirection" which will allow administrators to remotely enable, disable or format or configure individual drives and reload operating systems and software from remote locations, again independent of operating systems. Both AMT and IDE control are enabled by a new network interface controller.

"We all know our [operating system] friends don't crash that often, but it does happen," Tucker said.

Intel's reticence to speak publicly about what lies under the hood of its latest firmware technology has also prompted calls to come clean from IT security experts, including Queensland University of Technology's assistant dean for strategy and innovation, IT faculty, Bill Caelli.

"It's a dual use technology. It's got uses and misuses. Intel has to answer what guarantees it is prepared to give that home users are safe from hackers. Not maybes, guarantees".

Caelli said it was "critical Intel comes clean" about how the current DRM technology is embedded into the new CPU and chipset offering.

Microsoft was unavailable for comment at press time.
Yet another reason to go AMD.... :roll:

Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 10:11 am
by Warlock
iv allways used AMD :P

but for u anti piracy people thats good new for yall

Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:13 am
by Nosferatu
Ive been a loyal AMD user myself.

However, now that Intel has knuckled under to the big evil pigopolists, AMD should now be put under extremely close scrutiny.

In the past, AMD has followed suit on things like this and if the **AAs put enough pressure on them they might knuckle under as well.

I just love it when the pigopolists scream piracy in order to trample our rights and turn around and pay their artists less than 1% of the profits.

If a case could be made of any corporations being truely evil, of course Microsoft probably would stand out at the top. But, following closely behind would be these big media companies.

Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:59 am
by Krom
It's just like any bill that you see submitted to congress. If it has "rights" or "liberty" in the name, it is guaranteed to take some away.

Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 1:54 pm
by Ferno
if you think AMD is not going the DRM route, you're sadly mistaken.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/displa ... 20030.html

and this was eight months ago.

Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:06 pm
by Nosferatu

Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:51 pm
by Ferno
this article says otherwise.

http://www.overclockers.com/tips00789/