Jackson - Not Guilty on all counts
Jackson - Not Guilty on all counts
I bet this means they will leave him alone now.
Re: Jackson - Not Guilty on all counts
Not a chance. He's a wierdo... the tabloids will still find things to dis him with.Gooberman wrote:I bet this means they will leave him alone now.
-
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1369
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Shawnee, Kansas
Re: Jackson - Not Guilty on all counts
If you listened to the prosecutors comments on CNN afterward, he made a fairly scarey admission at one point. He caught himself, but he almost as much as admitted that he has a vendeta against MJ.snoopy wrote:Not a chance. He's a wierdo... the tabloids will still find things to dis him with.Gooberman wrote:I bet this means they will leave him alone now.
I hope someone got a recording of that.
- Lothar
- DBB Ghost Admin
- Posts: 12133
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: I'm so glad to be home
- Contact:
Re: Jackson - Not Guilty on all counts
"He" here means "the prosecutor". "He" in the original post referred to MJ, though.Nosferatu wrote:If you listened to the prosecutors comments on CNN afterward, he made a fairly scarey admission at one point. He caught himself, but he almost as much as admitted that he has a vendeta against MJ.
- De Rigueur
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Rural Mississippi, USA
Re: Jackson - Not Guilty on all counts
I think Snoopy should have said 'him' instead of 'he.' Should Gooberman's post read Will they leave MJ alone -or- Will they leave MJ's alleged victim alone?Lothar wrote:"He" here means "the prosecutor". "He" in the original post referred to MJ, though.Nosferatu wrote:If you listened to the prosecutors comments on CNN afterward, he made a fairly scarey admission at one point. He caught himself, but he almost as much as admitted that he has a vendeta against MJ.
That's my take, anyway.
Concerning MJ, I think he should take his own advice: Beat it.
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
you've been hit by, you've been struck by, a smooth criminal
after MJ's admission in an interview that he thinks "sharing your bed with a child is a beautiful thing" does anyone really think he's not just a little strange? or even guilty? even tho they couldnt prove it " beyond a resonable doubt " the courts might have found him innocent, but they found OJ innocent also just goes to show if you have the coin you can do anything you want
after MJ's admission in an interview that he thinks "sharing your bed with a child is a beautiful thing" does anyone really think he's not just a little strange? or even guilty? even tho they couldnt prove it " beyond a resonable doubt " the courts might have found him innocent, but they found OJ innocent also just goes to show if you have the coin you can do anything you want
- Iceman
- DBB Habitual Type Killer
- Posts: 4929
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2000 2:01 am
- Location: Huntsville, AL. USA
- Contact:
The word is already out that this trial costs so much that it will be a cold day in hel| before they go after him again. Barring that is, some unforseen glowing evidence.
If he really does molest little boys this aquittal will simply give him more confidence that he can continue without getting caught. If he really is innocent ... well ... good for him.
If he really does molest little boys this aquittal will simply give him more confidence that he can continue without getting caught. If he really is innocent ... well ... good for him.
No question that he is strange. But guilty? I don't know; I didn't see the evidence. I wasnâ??t paying attention to the trial.CUDA wrote:after MJ's admission in an interview that he thinks "sharing your bed with a child is a beautiful thing" does anyone really think he's not just a little strange? or even guilty?
As far as him being guilty just because he "shares his bed with a child", I couldn't disagree with you more. I share my bed with my daughter; we take naps together all the time. Does that make me a child molester?
While it may be inappropriate for him to do that with a child that he not closely related to, that still doesn't make him a child molester.
I wonder how much parents would do, though. I mean, he isn't getting anywhere close to my furture kids... what parent would let their kid go to MJ's park thing after all the negative publicity?Iceman wrote:If he really does molest little boys this aquittal will simply give him more confidence that he can continue without getting caught. If he really is innocent ... well ... good for him.
- Vertigo 99
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2684
- Joined: Tue May 25, 1999 2:01 am
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
did you see triumph at MJ's hearing on conan obrien? some lady he interviewed said she'd let MJ babysit her kids because she trusts him. some wierd people out there, for sure. and it aint just MJ.snoopy wrote:I wonder how much parents would do, though. I mean, he isn't getting anywhere close to my furture kids... what parent would let their kid go to MJ's park thing after all the negative publicity?Iceman wrote:If he really does molest little boys this aquittal will simply give him more confidence that he can continue without getting caught. If he really is innocent ... well ... good for him.
i didn't really follow the trial, just bits i heard over the international news.
but kurupt are you saying that there was evidence that he was molesting children? i'd like to hear it (i'm not being sarcastic, i really would like to hear it coz i havn't been following the case).
from what i've heard, it seems like he's harmless. a bit crazy yeah, but harmless. what was teh most convincing evidence that he molested kids? anyone?
but kurupt are you saying that there was evidence that he was molesting children? i'd like to hear it (i'm not being sarcastic, i really would like to hear it coz i havn't been following the case).
from what i've heard, it seems like he's harmless. a bit crazy yeah, but harmless. what was teh most convincing evidence that he molested kids? anyone?
- Aggressor Prime
- DBB Captain
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: USA