DescentBB

I bet this means they will leave him alone now.

Meh, sure the dude's a little off, but there wasn't enough hard evidence against Jacko. It could have happened, but they didn't do a good enough job of proving it beyond the shadow of a doubt.

Just because he's not guilty doesn't mean he's note a general weirdo of a slimeball.

Weirdo = yes.
Slimeball = I don't think so.

He's just a disturbed person who really needs some help.

Mobius wrote:He's just a disturbed person who really needs some help.

Not sure if I'd say "just"... but aside from that, I agree.

Gooberman wrote:I bet this means they will leave him alone now.

Not a chance. He's a wierdo... the tabloids will still find things to dis him with.

Mobius wrote: He's just a disturbed person who really needs some help.

Hi, my name is Pot! You must be Kettle. Hey look at you! You're black!

Sorry, couldn't resist

snoopy wrote:

Gooberman wrote:I bet this means they will leave him alone now.

Not a chance. He's a wierdo... the tabloids will still find things to dis him with.

If you listened to the prosecutors comments on CNN afterward, he made a fairly scarey admission at one point. He caught himself, but he almost as much as admitted that he has a vendeta against MJ.

I hope someone got a recording of that.

I guess that begs the questions of who "he" is in Goob's post, I assumed it was MJ himself, not the little dude.

Nosferatu wrote:If you listened to the prosecutors comments on CNN afterward, he made a fairly scarey admission at one point. He caught himself, but he almost as much as admitted that he has a vendeta against MJ.

"He" here means "the prosecutor". "He" in the original post referred to MJ, though.

Lothar wrote:

Nosferatu wrote:If you listened to the prosecutors comments on CNN afterward, he made a fairly scarey admission at one point. He caught himself, but he almost as much as admitted that he has a vendeta against MJ.

"He" here means "the prosecutor". "He" in the original post referred to MJ, though.

I think Snoopy should have said 'him' instead of 'he.' Should Gooberman's post read Will they leave MJ alone -or- Will they leave MJ's alleged victim alone?

That's my take, anyway.

Concerning MJ, I think he should take his own advice: Beat it.

He would do well to keep an empty house for a while.If he wants to help kids, then visit them in Cancer wards with other around.

There's a lot he can do besides running a fun park.

you've been hit by, you've been struck by, a smooth criminal

after MJ's admission in an interview that he thinks "sharing your bed with a child is a beautiful thing" does anyone really think he's not just a little strange? or even guilty? even tho they couldnt prove it " beyond a resonable doubt " the courts might have found him innocent, but they found OJ innocent also just goes to show if you have the coin you can do anything you want

The word is already out that this trial costs so much that it will be a cold day in hel| before they go after him again. Barring that is, some unforseen glowing evidence.

If he really does molest little boys this aquittal will simply give him more confidence that he can continue without getting caught. If he really is innocent ... well ... good for him.

CUDA wrote:after MJ's admission in an interview that he thinks "sharing your bed with a child is a beautiful thing" does anyone really think he's not just a little strange? or even guilty?

No question that he is strange. But guilty? I don't know; I didn't see the evidence. I wasnâ??t paying attention to the trial.

As far as him being guilty just because he "shares his bed with a child", I couldn't disagree with you more. I share my bed with my daughter; we take naps together all the time. Does that make me a child molester?

While it may be inappropriate for him to do that with a child that he not closely related to, that still doesn't make him a child molester.

Iceman wrote:If he really does molest little boys this aquittal will simply give him more confidence that he can continue without getting caught. If he really is innocent ... well ... good for him.

I wonder how much parents would do, though. I mean, he isn't getting anywhere close to my furture kids... what parent would let their kid go to MJ's park thing after all the negative publicity?

ohwell, i figured he would get off.

probably payed several jurors heaps of money....

he will always be "Micheal Jack-Off" to me.

Yea, he payed the jury monopoly money to ignore unexistant evidence.

I don't really pay attention to 'celebrity justice'

snoopy wrote:

Iceman wrote:If he really does molest little boys this aquittal will simply give him more confidence that he can continue without getting caught. If he really is innocent ... well ... good for him.

I wonder how much parents would do, though. I mean, he isn't getting anywhere close to my furture kids... what parent would let their kid go to MJ's park thing after all the negative publicity?

did you see triumph at MJ's hearing on conan obrien? some lady he interviewed said she'd let MJ babysit her kids because she trusts him. some wierd people out there, for sure. and it aint just MJ.

Mobius wrote:Weirdo = yes.
Slimeball = I don't think so.

He's just a disturbed person who really needs some help.

Exactly. His father is the one thats the pervert IMO.

i didn't really follow the trial, just bits i heard over the international news.
but kurupt are you saying that there was evidence that he was molesting children? i'd like to hear it (i'm not being sarcastic, i really would like to hear it coz i havn't been following the case).

from what i've heard, it seems like he's harmless. a bit crazy yeah, but harmless. what was teh most convincing evidence that he molested kids? anyone?

He has money, let's leave it at that.

and likes little boys

Allegedly