Ok... continuing with the thread...
Admiral Thrawn wrote:Why do we celebrate Christmas? And is it truly Christ's Birthday? And how did this holiday originate?
Christmas is used today to celebrate the birth of Christ. Since we don't know the exact age of Christ at any one point in history, it is futile to say that any particular day is Christ's birthday. At best, there is a 1/365 chance that Christ was born on a December 25th. We celebrate Christmas because we like to remember Christ's birth--and, it's a socially accepted way for companies to sell lots of stuff.
"Christmas" probably originated in the Dark Ages under the rule of the Catholic Church--we don't know that much about its origins, but it is commonly thought that it was put in place by the Catholic Church to replace a pagan holiday that customarily took place on the same date, thereby turning it into a "Christian" event. The holiday spread throughout Catholicism, and thus our holiday today. It's similar to the reason we celebrate St. Patrick's Day. It's a social matter, not necessarily a Christian one.
Think of it this way: If tomorrow, every Christian on the planet renounced Christmas, would the holiday disappear? Of course not. Companies make too much money off it. Christians celebrate Christmas, these days, since the rest of the culture does. It's part of America's lifestyle.
Admiral Thrawn wrote:What truly happens to the dead?
That's an interesting question. The short answer is, there's a lot of answers depending on your denomination and branch of Christianity. It's also an incredibly complex thing that the Bible never really sets out in a defined place--I.E. "THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DIE. 1. blahblah 2. yakyak etc."
Basic Catholicism dictates (and I may be way off base about this, please correct me if you know more than I) that when you die you go to Purgatory, a sort of "minor hell" for Christians, in which place you stay until your sins that have not been purified on earth have been atoned for. Catholics believe that these sins can be atoned for in Purgatory, contrary to the Protestant belief that a sin can only be atoned for through Christ's death. After the Christian has atoned for his sins, he will enter heaven; non-Christians will go to hell. Like I said before, I've never studied this too much, and my sources may have been wrong on this one. If anyone knows more on this than I do, by all means, correct me.
Basic Protestantism has 2 mainstream beliefs, each backed up by its own scripture verses: 1. we go straight to judgement when we die, and are sent from there either directly to heaven or to hell, and 2. we stay dead, in essence in a state of sleep, until the end of the earth, when Christ returns for the second time. Then all men are judged together, at the same time.
Skyalmian has one thing right in my mind--there is more to a person than the simple 3-dimensional being that we see. God is spirit, and cannot be seen by us. He is not visible in our world--yet we were made "in his image". Being made in the image of a spirit, it would seem that though we have physical bodies, we also have a spiritual body, one that cannot be seen by our senses. Again, this is my thoughts only, and I would be considered a heretic by some denominations for my beliefs--but it is extremely obvious, to my mind, that there is more to this universe than the 4 dimensions we know of (the 4 dimensions of space, and the dimension of time).
Admiral Thrawn wrote:What's up with the speaking in tongues? What purpose does it serve?
This is almost an entirely Protestant question, and one with which I am fairly familiar. Different denominations have different views on speaking in tongues, ranging from considering you a heretic if you have spoken in tongues to considering you a heretic if you haven't spoken in tongues at least once before.
Speaking in tongues is considered by most a gift of the Spirit, the third "part" of God. The knowledge of the idea of speaking in tongues came from Pentecost, where 5,000 people came to believe in Christ after the apostles, speaking about Christ, began speaking languages of which they had no knowledge. Every man in the audience could hear his own language, according to the passage, despite the fact that the apostles knew probably only three or four languages.
This implementation leads me personally to believe that speaking in tongues is a practical thing that would occur only under inspiration of the Spirit.
Just to point out some interesting things:
The Bible talks in several places about crying out to the Lord, and of various people who tried to express their feelings about God, but couldn't because of the restraints of language. "Groanings of the heart" I believe was a phrase used in one of these instances. Modern-day speaking in tongues isn't really practical since no person can really understand what is being said, but it gives vent in a way to these "groanings of the heart", in a way that Charismatics believe God can understand.
Admiral Thrawn wrote:What is God's Kingdom?
Short answer: There are two possible understandings of God's Kingdom, both valid in a way. It can be used as a reference to Christians around the earth, or it can be used to refer to the kingdom Christ is expected to set up at the end of the world, over which he will rule, and which will consist of all his "children" (Christians). In either case, it's mostly used to refer to a body of believers.
Admiral Thrawn wrote:What is God's name? Why do some religions emphasize his name while others do not?
This is where things get interesting. Judaism takes very, VERY seriously the command in the Old Testament of not taking the Lord's name in vain. They won't write or speak any name of God, abbreviating the word God when it must be written as G-d.
Catholicism and Protestantism are a little looser, speaking freely of God, but in each case God does not simply have a name--this is why we call him God. The name primarily used to refer to God outside of the word God itself is Yahweh, though there are literally hundreds of other names used to refer to God. Elohim, Redeemer, Lord, God, El Shaddai, Adonai, Jehovah, Shepherd, Judge, El Elyon, Abhir, Branch, Alpha and Omega, and many, many others.
This site has a fuller list.
God's name is so hard to pin down since God is so hard to pin down--there's no name that can really describe all of God--except, perhaps, the name God.
Admiral Thrawn wrote:Why are religions so involved in political affairs? Especially war? If the bible is always talking about loving thy neighbor.
An excellent question. I'm running out of time here before I have to leave again, but for now let me just say that in the New Testament, Jesus condemned most violence. He healed the soldier hurt by Peter when he was arrested to be crucified. Jesus talks--a LOT--about loving your neighbors, enemies, and everyone in general.
God, in the Old Testament, commands the Israelites to take a land, and kill everyone in it. Israel failed in that assignment, but that doesn't remove the fact that God commanded it. Some Christians use this as the reason they thing it is ok for Christians to go to war. Other Christians use the commandment "Thou shalt not murder" to condemn war, but this also fails to address the subject fully because "murder" in this case is talking about an unjustified killing of another person.
Christians are told, many times, not to use violence in the New Testament. Personally, I think violence is justified in certain circumstances of self defence, but I do not think that war is always the answer to a problem. In fact, it is very, very rarely the answer to a problem.
I've got to leave now, but I'll post more on your questions later.