Page 1 of 1
Vikings
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:40 pm
by TheCope
With the controversy brewing here in Minnesota with a particular sports team and their alleged "sex party" aboard 2 charted boats on Lake Minnetonka I thought I would take a poll. Why should those strippers aboard that boat be the only ones who gets to take a poll?
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:48 pm
by dissent
Didn't they just win a game recently.
Q. Does this correlate with the party?
If so, perhaps test hypothesis again for confirmation, maybe first result was an outlier.
Q. Did they lose their game after the party?
If so, perhaps test hypothesis again for confirmation, maybe first result was an outlier.
Re: Vikings
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:54 pm
by woodchip
TheCope wrote: Why should those strippers aboard that boat be the only ones who gets to take a poll?
It would read better if you substitute "pole" for
"poll".
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 3:03 pm
by TheCope
yea, that was a misspelling sorry mobius.
;-0
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 4:09 pm
by Ferno
anyone see baseball players being kicked out for steroid usage?
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:57 pm
by Avder
The vikings are a classless orgqanization. Their new owner needs to fire a few people.....out of a cannon, in to the sun.
If its not their horrible play on field, its their horrible play OFF the field. I'm sick of them.
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:00 pm
by roid
it's the same here, they get preferential treatment and get away with more than the average joe would be allowed to.
most of the people who ever win teh "Australian of the year" award or whatever, they are always sportsmen or sportswomen.
(ps: what happened to the "delete post" option?)
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:30 pm
by woodchip
Ferno wrote:anyone see baseball players being kicked out for steroid usage?
Well there is a difference here. The roundball guys do the steroid thing in the dark of night. The porkball boys did their thing in the light of day in front of the ships crew. Guess it shows the intelligence difference between the two sports.
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:13 am
by Will Robinson
I'd say the answer is both. We love to build them up then tear them down, that is americas real number one spectator sport!
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:51 am
by WarAdvocat
Not enough options in this poll.
Where's the "No" & "No, not held to a high enough standard" options?
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 9:34 am
by Testiculese
Why is anything these people do off the field any of [your] business?
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 10:06 am
by TheCope
It isn't any of my business.
But theyâ??re a crappy team and they are getting their jj's off by professional escorts shipped in from Atlanta when they should be earning their overpay.
If I was rich I would most definitely have sex parties, that's not my criticism. My complaint is that they had to use hookers... I mean how lame is that?
Now reports are coming out that some of the coaches and management may also been involved in this incident. Itâ??s drama I tell ya. Unfortunately the press coverage only means I have to endure hearing these intellectual nothings try to eek out sentences. Thatâ??s the real hard part for me.
;-0
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 10:07 pm
by Sarge
Sideline View
Vikings Give New Meaning to Term 'Love Boat'
By Leonard Shapiro
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, October 14, 2005; 6:33 PM
The Minnesota Vikings have given new meaning to the term "Love Boat" if the allegations of sexual misconduct by a number of players on board two charter vessels last week eventually are proven to be true.
You've seen the initial stories. A group of 17 players accompanied by who knows who boarded the boats and set sail on Lake Minnetonka last Thursday for what sounded like a 90-minute orgy.
There were reports of naked lap dancing, oral sex, excessive drinking and who knows what else in full view of crew members. They were so appalled by the display, the boats quickly returned to their home port, the better for the crews to immediately swab the decks, take cleansing showers and report to the authorities what can only be described as outrageous behavior if the initial reports can be substantiated.
As a long-time observer of America's favorite professional sport, very little about the NFL surprises me any more. I'm only surprised that even more such incidents haven't been reported over the years.
To its credit, the league tries to emphasize to its players that once they sign their first contract, they will be subject to intense scrutiny and never really can escape the harsh glare of the public spotlight. Every spring, every drafted playter is required to attend a rookie seminar, with three days of role-playing included in the program designed to show them how easy it can be to get in trouble. Teams emphasize it as well, bringing in former FBI agents to lecture their players, even hiring player developmental experts to steer the lads toward the straight and narrow.
But how do you tell a 22-year-old kid with a freshly minted bank book with lots of zeroes on his balance that he can lose it all in the allegation of a scorned or battered woman, a night of drunken excess followed by a DWI citation, an arrest for assault and battery in a bar. These kids, and many of these veterans who should know better, often believe they're invincible and maybe even above the law.
Does anyone now wonder why the NFL insisted that ESPN cancel its popular "Playmakers" show after one season a few years ago. Though it provided a fictional account of a pro football team, all those televised tales of players shooting up before games, abusing their wives, drinking to wretched excess and many more transgressions were clearly too much for the NFL to bear, especially if it tarnished the public's view of the league.
And yet, almost every week of every year for as long as I can remember, NFL players invariably have done something dumb, dumber or flat out illegal, with the Vikings one of the leaders in the clubhouse over the last 20 years.
Isn't this the team that once had to fire an assistant coach, Richard Solomon in the mid-90s for sexual harassment, where running back Onterrio Smith was suspended for a full year for admitting to using a so-called Whizzinator to hide his use of illegal substances, where the current head coach, Mike Tice admitted to scalping Super Bowl tickets last year and where that solid citizen, Randy Moss, was allowed to get away with all manner of bad behavior over the years?
Then again, the Vikings are hardly alone. The Dallas Cowboys of the 1990s had some star players, including Pro Bowlers Michael Irvin and Nate Newton, that rented a house not far from the practice facility to smoke a little dope, make a little love and get down and dirty on a regular basis.
The reverberations of this latest Vikings caper will be felt for years in the Twin Cities.
It occurred just at the same time lobbyists for the team were actually pressing state legislators to call for a special session to consider providing public funding for a new stadium.
Oh really? How do you spell fat chance, especially in light of the Minnetonka fiasco.
It also occurred at a time when the team, one some experts actually felt had legitimate Super Bowl aspirations, was coming off a bye week after a 1-3 start. I'd venture a guess the Vikings won't win three more games this season, what with the distraction of the boat debacle on their collective minds.
Tice, of course, is toast, and that's truly a shame. I've known him since he was a quarterback at the University of Maryland and followed his career as a fine tight end in Seattle to his days as one of the better offensive line coaches in the league.
The Vikings previous owner, Red McCombs, truly embarrassed him by making Tice the lowest paid head coach in the league when Dennis Green left town three years ago. But Tice, to his credit, kept his team competitive despite earning less money than a number of assistant coaches around the league.
Now he's almost certain to be fired, unless, miracle of miracles, he can find a way to turn this disaster into a rallying point for his team. "It can tear a team apart or bring us together," Tice said on Wednesday, "and it's my job to bring the team together."
That will be a Herculean task for what surely is the first lame-duck coach of the 2005 season. But if he can get this team back on track and somehow win the atrociously mediocre NFC Central, new owner Zygi Wilf ought to reward him with a pay raise and a long-term contract. It's the least he could do.
But that's probably not going to happen. This Viking ship is sinking fast, joining those two Love Boats in taking this team down to uncharted depths, even for the NFL.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 01674.html
(subscribe, ya bums)
I like the part about Micheal Irvin and Nate Newton. I see Irvin on TV and people treat him like he's some freakin god.... he's a freakin CRIMINAL! He's a freakin ex-con! I don't get it...
Of course, Pete Rose is on the tube also so I guess that makes it alright.