Which Is It? (media bias)
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 1:10 pm
Alright, this is one of the most striking and definitive examples of liberal slanting in recent memory.
A lesbian Methodist minister in Philadelphia has been defrocked.
ABC News (owned by Disney) claims that it is because she was sexually active and thereby violated the requirement that Methodist ministers remain celibate. She can be reinstated as long as she vows to remain celibate.
The Boston Globe (owned by the New York Times) claims that it was because she was a lesbian, and she has no hope of rejoining the church. Furthermore, such action is part of a "clean sweep for conservatives" as it conincides with the reinstatement of an anti-gay minister (any possible information about which can only be found on the membership-only second page of the article -- I don't have a registration, and I'm sure 90% of the people who will read this article linked from Google News won't either).
So which is it? Is she enjoined from becoming a minister, or does the possibility remain open? Was her punishment motivated by a conservative push to oust a lesbian minister, or was it because she broke a restriction that's in place for both men and women?
How does this reflect on the parent organizations of these news sources, both of which are commonly decried as "liberally biased" by mouthpieces on the right?
I'm particularly interested in the Globe article. It seems that now that they're through beating the Catholic Church to a pulp, they're moving on to other Christian sects.
A lesbian Methodist minister in Philadelphia has been defrocked.
ABC News (owned by Disney) claims that it is because she was sexually active and thereby violated the requirement that Methodist ministers remain celibate. She can be reinstated as long as she vows to remain celibate.
The Boston Globe (owned by the New York Times) claims that it was because she was a lesbian, and she has no hope of rejoining the church. Furthermore, such action is part of a "clean sweep for conservatives" as it conincides with the reinstatement of an anti-gay minister (any possible information about which can only be found on the membership-only second page of the article -- I don't have a registration, and I'm sure 90% of the people who will read this article linked from Google News won't either).
So which is it? Is she enjoined from becoming a minister, or does the possibility remain open? Was her punishment motivated by a conservative push to oust a lesbian minister, or was it because she broke a restriction that's in place for both men and women?
How does this reflect on the parent organizations of these news sources, both of which are commonly decried as "liberally biased" by mouthpieces on the right?
I'm particularly interested in the Globe article. It seems that now that they're through beating the Catholic Church to a pulp, they're moving on to other Christian sects.