DescentBB

I added a MOD tonight that will allow you to upload images to postimage.org.

Ther eis a 2 meg limit, it will automatically create a thumbnail and add the link to your post.

The thumbnail is linked to the full size image. See my test of the MOD here.
phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=8814

The link above should look something like this ...



KB

To USE this cool new mod....

yea what duper said!

I did notice that, but I'll stick to my own web space for now, this server doesn't look like it needs any extra work.

That's always prefered but I know many users either don't have a website or maybe the means to post a picture

KB

Thank you KB! Something many hostless posters have been clamoring for.

I aim to please, I fall short most of the time but my desire is an honest one.

Instead of an image hoster can we have avitars that are 90x90? Opens up so much more fun stuff

I think, given Couver's post, we need [sarcasm] tags.

I have a 145x200 avatar in another forum, it's nice in a quiet forum but not on the DBB, even sigs are disabled here, much as I hate 64x64 I think we should stick with it.

what we don't need is giant avatars and banner signatures!!!

i used to be guilty of this. my own animated avatar is a bit distracting, but i really don't want to have to turn off images just to browse this forum...

Sigs, we need sigs...

MY SIG:

I see no problem with avatars as large as 100x100, since the current layout easily allows for it (fits upto 120 pixels before breaking format). Even with the current filesize limit (which is a tad bit much IMO. People need to learn how to compress images better.) it easily allows for it. As for sigs, bring them back. If you don't want to see them, just go into your profile (once KB gets things set up) and turn them off.

i've always thought that signatures were a text line at the bottom of the post. not an image.

fyrephlie wrote:MY SIG:

heh... nahhh.. It should be Diedel's. That him using Lunix!

jakee308 wrote:i've always thought that signatures were a text line at the bottom of the post. not an image.

some forums allow images in sigs, so in those forums ppl often JUST use an image as their sig although they can use text as well.

roid wrote:

jakee308 wrote:i've always thought that signatures were a text line at the bottom of the post. not an image.

some forums allow images in sigs, so in those forums ppl often JUST use an image as their sig although they can use text as well.

and it is usually some poorly constructed banner image that says something like... XXX CLAN RoXXoRZ j0R BoXXorZ!!!

yeah and tests you for epilepsy

Aus-RED-5 wrote:

fyrephlie wrote:MY SIG:

heh... nahhh.. It should be Diedel's. That him using Lunix!

I HAVE READ THAT, AUS!

KoolBear is the Koolest!

Aus-RED-5 wrote: heh... nahhh.. It should be Diedel's. That him using Lunix!

"Lunix" hah! perfect! i'll be using that meself thank you very much Aus-RED-5.

i first found that looking for something to post in response to mobi... that's his grammar nazi act

if i watch that "lunix" avatar too long, i start to get ill!
very good job fyrephlie! it takes a bit to make me queasy. there's just enough detail in that thing to do it for me. (love those flying eyeballs) yyeecchh! (i have experienced that sort of rage. not just over lunix either.)

Diedel wrote:

Aus-RED-5 wrote:

fyrephlie wrote:MY SIG:

heh... nahhh.. It should be Diedel's. That him using Lunix!

I HAVE READ THAT, AUS!