The case pits against each other two men in their 70s, who are from the same central Italian town and even went to the same seminary school in their teenage years.
Who wants to guess which one was molested as a choir boy by a pedo-priest?!?
Sorry, couldn't resist the temptation...the serpent in the garden made me say it!
Heh, i find it funny that all around the world people are still the same, Cascioli is yet another example of a \"fanatic\" fighting the opposite fanatic's views to further his own.. To be expected in debate-based areas like court i guess.
Cascioli's book sounds intriguing... since he says he PROVED that Jesus didn't exist. I wonder if it's in just Italian... I wanna know what his proof is.
A popular book of the early 19th century Historic Doubts Relative To Jesus Of Nazareth, whose arguments are still echoed by many skeptics today, used Hume's methods of knowledge to prove that it was highly unlikely that Jesus ever existed in the first place. Richard Whatley (1787-1863) replies to this book in a classic essay Historic Doubts Relative To Napoleon Buonaparte. Whatley applies Hume's methods of knowledge to Napolean and concludes that Napoleon probably never really existed either.
Dissent.. not legally no, but the Supreme Court has been heavily exercising \"International Precedance\".
And with thier tendancy to favor the ACLU, (who I'm sure is all over this like flies on poo) it won't be long before we see this in our courts as well.